Home     About     Services     Projects     Opportunities     Donate     eList     Contact

IFCAE Project:

Northwest Forest Plan Socio-Economic Assessment
 

 

 
Timeframe:  2003-06

Investigators:   Rebecca J. McLain, Lita Buttolph, Lisa Tobe, Will Kay, Candi Dillingham

USDA-FS Collaborators:  Susan Charnley (USDA-FS, PNW Research Station) and Ellen Donoghue (USDA-FS, PNW Research Station)
Administration:  Joint Venture Agreement – IFCAE and USDA-FS PNW Research Station
Funding Organizations:  USDA-FS, Pacific Northwest Research Station
In-Kind Contributions: IFCAE

Publications:


    Technical Reports.  Published by the U.S. Forest Service:

NW Forest Plan: The first 10 years: socioeconomic monitoring of the Olympic NF and three local communities

NW Forest Plan: The first 10 years: socioeconomic monitoring of Coos Bay District and three local communities

NW Forest Plan: The first 10 years (1994–2003): Socioeconomic Monitoring Results

NW Forest Plan: The first 10 years: socioeconomic monitoring on the Mt. Hood NF

NW Forest Plan: The first 10 years: socioeconomic monitoring of the Okanogan-Wenatchee NF and Five Local Communities.


    Journal Articles:

Charnley, S., McLain, R.J., and Donoghue, E. 2008. Forest policy, amenity value migration, and community well-being in the American West: reflections from the Northwest Forest Plan. Human Ecology. 36:743–761

McLain, Rebecca J., Donoghue, E., Buttolph, L., Kusel, J., and Charnley, S. 2008. Multiscale Assessments Across Large-Scale Ecosystems: Lessons From Practice. Society and Natural Resources. Publication.  Volume 21, Issue 8, September 2008. Pages 719 - 728.


Project Overview:

The Northwest Forest Plan Socio-Economic Monitoring project was a three-year joint effort by IFCAE and U.S. Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station social scientists to assess the socioeconomic impacts of the environmental protection, timber production, and economic assistance provisions of the Northwest Forest Plan on forest communities in Oregon, Washington, and California. In Phase I, the research team carried out case studies of the Mount Hood, Olympic, and Klamath National Forests, the Coos Bay Bureau of Land Management District, and twelve rural communities. In Phase II, the team applied the methods developed during Phase I to the Okanogan National Forest and five surrounding communities. The assessment team found that communities differed greatly in their ability to cope with the social and economic shocks associated with the sharp decline in the amount of federal timber available after the Plan’s implementation. Larger, less remote, and more economically diverse communities tended to do better, in part because residents had the skills and knowledge needed to take advantage of the economic assistance programs associated with the Plan. The team also found that chronic and substantial declines in the Forest Service’s budget and personnel hampered the ability of the agency to invest in alternative management infrastructures, such as tourism and recreation, to replace the timber-focused management infrastructure.