IFCAE Project:
Northwest Forest Plan Socio-Economic Assessment
|
|
| Timeframe:
2003-06 |
|
Investigators:
Rebecca J. McLain, Lita Buttolph,
Lisa Tobe, Will
Kay, Candi Dillingham |
|
USDA-FS
Collaborators:
Susan Charnley (USDA-FS, PNW Research Station) and Ellen Donoghue
(USDA-FS, PNW Research Station) |
|
Administration:
Joint
Venture Agreement – IFCAE and USDA-FS PNW Research Station |
| Funding Organizations:
USDA-FS, Pacific Northwest Research Station |
|
In-Kind
Contributions:
IFCAE |
Publications:
Technical Reports.
Published by the U.S. Forest Service:
NW Forest Plan: The first 10 years: socioeconomic monitoring of the
Olympic NF and three local communities
NW Forest Plan: The first 10 years: socioeconomic monitoring of Coos
Bay District and three local communities
NW Forest Plan: The first 10 years (1994–2003): Socioeconomic
Monitoring Results
NW Forest Plan: The first 10 years: socioeconomic monitoring on
the Mt. Hood NF
NW Forest Plan: The first 10 years: socioeconomic monitoring
of the Okanogan-Wenatchee NF and Five Local Communities.
Journal Articles:
Charnley, S., McLain, R.J., and Donoghue, E.
2008. Forest
policy, amenity value migration, and community well-being in the
American West: reflections from the Northwest Forest Plan. Human
Ecology. 36:743–761
McLain, Rebecca J., Donoghue, E., Buttolph, L., Kusel, J., and
Charnley, S. 2008. Multiscale Assessments Across Large-Scale
Ecosystems: Lessons From Practice. Society and Natural Resources.
Publication. Volume 21, Issue 8, September 2008. Pages 719 -
728. |
Project Overview:
The Northwest Forest Plan Socio-Economic Monitoring project was a
three-year joint effort by IFCAE and U.S. Forest Service Pacific Northwest
Research Station social scientists to assess the socioeconomic impacts of the
environmental protection, timber production, and economic assistance provisions
of the Northwest Forest Plan on forest communities in Oregon, Washington, and
California. In Phase I, the research team carried out case studies of the Mount
Hood, Olympic, and Klamath National Forests, the Coos Bay Bureau of Land
Management District, and twelve rural communities. In Phase II, the team applied
the methods developed during Phase I to the Okanogan National Forest and five
surrounding communities. The assessment team found that communities differed
greatly in their ability to cope with the social and economic shocks associated
with the sharp decline in the amount of federal timber available after the
Plan’s implementation. Larger, less remote, and more economically diverse
communities tended to do better, in part because residents had the skills and
knowledge needed to take advantage of the economic assistance programs
associated with the Plan. The team also found that chronic and substantial
declines in the Forest Service’s budget and personnel hampered the ability of
the agency to invest in alternative management infrastructures, such as tourism
and recreation, to replace the timber-focused management infrastructure.
|