|
This section provides the reader with a quick overview of the topics
addressed in each of our modules. It is intended to illustrate the
range of pertinent topics and how they interrelate. The major topics
and issues to consider for a participatory monitoring project can be
divided into three major stages: Planning, Implementation, and
Follow-through. The following table lists our modules and which stage
they occupy.
Table 1—Stages and
Modules of a Participatory Monitoring Project
|
Project Stage |
Module name |
Type of
Information |
|
Planning |
Documentation |
Documenting a
participatory monitoring project |
|
Goals |
Determining
monitoring goals |
|
Indicators |
Selecting
biological indicators |
|
Collaboration |
Evaluating
the usefulness and goals of collaboration |
|
Decisions |
Making
systematic and collaborative decisions |
|
Context |
Evaluating
the context of a participatory monitoring project |
|
Organization |
Organizing
the structure of a participatory monitoring project |
|
Participants |
Recruiting,
selecting, authorizing, and dismissing participants |
|
Communication |
Developing
good understandings and agreements |
|
Incentives |
Understanding
motivations, concerns, and anticipated benefits |
|
Design |
Involving
participants in project design |
|
Resources |
Obtaining and
allocating funds, resources, and support |
|
Implementation |
Training |
Providing
participants with requisite training |
|
Safety |
Ensuring
safety and planning for emergencies |
|
Field |
Planning
field activities |
|
Sampling |
Developing
sampling designs and data collection procedures |
|
Quality |
Ensuring the
quality and credibility of collected data |
|
Data |
Making
arrangements for handling, storing, and using data |
|
Follow-through |
Analysis |
Arranging for
periodic data analysis |
|
Reporting |
Arranging for
reporting results |
|
Evaluation |
Evaluating
and improving the project |
|
Celebrations |
Ensuring the
project is rewarding and appreciated |
Not every monitoring project that involves participants needs
to address all of the stages or module topics in these guidelines;
however, becoming familiar with them can help the user avoid obstacles
and improve current or future projects. Depending on the goals and
context of a particular monitoring project, participants could be
involved in any or all of the three stages of the project, or they
might be involved with different levels of intensity and commitment at
each stage. For example, participants might be included in the
Planning stage and invited to meetings to identify the goals and
objectives of an upcoming monitoring project. Or participants could
be included in the Implementation stage of a monitoring project by
involving them in data collection (in which case the Training, Safety,
and Field modules would be most appropriate). If a monitoring project
has already collected data, participants can help examine the results
and suggest further steps for disseminating the information to
interested parties. In this case, the Analysis and Reporting modules
of the Follow-Through stage would be most useful. The stages are
simply conceptual; therefore the modules may be used independently, in
any combination, or in any sequence, depending on the needs of each
project and its participants.
Planning
Stage
The importance of clear goals cannot be over-emphasized. Developing
clear goals for the monitoring project is the first step in
determining whether a participatory approach is appropriate and will
influence all the remaining parts of the project planning. For
example, the goal might be to collect presence/absence information on
invasive weeds across a large area, in which case large numbers of
participants can be involved with little training needed. Conversely,
the goal might be to inventory the entire flora of a park, possibly
requiring extensive botanical training. A project goal might
primarily be to increase public awareness and education about
management practices in an area, or it could be to ground-truth remote
sensing data. Each monitoring goal can lend itself to participant
involvement in different ways and to differing extents. Similarly,
every monitoring project operates within an organizational structure
that must be taken into account when involving participants. While
these guidelines provide an overarching synthesis of participatory
monitoring literature and lessons from practitioners, many agencies
and organizations provide publications or offices that can help the
reader address their own organization’s peculiarities and
requirements.
Documentation -
Documenting a participatory monitoring project plan
Clear documentation, shared by all, can turn a participatory
monitoring project into an exercise in building trust, conflict
resolution and co-learning. This module offers suggestions for how to
document everything about the project so that anyone can review and
understand the process and results.
Goals - Determining
monitoring goals
Defining the purpose and intended results for monitoring goals can be
a way of involving participants early in the project. However, even
if a project is already underway when participants become involved,
taking the time to make sure everyone understands and agrees on the
goals of the project will make the overall process more efficient and
enjoyable. This module alerts the reader to issues explored in
greater depth in later modules, including the regulatory and
landownership context in which a project is taking place.
Indicators -
Selecting biological indicators
This module provides background on the use of biological indicators,
organizations that can provide detailed information on the selection
process, as well as ways to involve participants with local ecological
knowledge in the selection of indicators.
Collaboration -
Evaluating the usefulness and goals of collaboration
Before entering into a collaboration or participatory project, it is a
good idea to evaluate the potential advantages and disadvantages to
involving participants in biological monitoring. Participants can be
involved in any and all stages of a monitoring project and at varying
levels of intensity.
Decisions - Making
systematic and collaborative decisions
Making decisions in a clear, systematic, and jointly agreed upon
manner will greatly improve trust between managers, participants, and
stakeholders. Participants can be involved in decision-making at any
stage of the monitoring project process. This module offers
suggestions for ways managers can incorporate collaborative
decision-making into their projects, including education, training,
neutral facilitation, and general principles for making collaboration
work.
Context -
Evaluating the context of a participatory monitoring project
The political, social, cultural and economic context will likely
affect project design and the type and extent of participant
involvement. This module suggests ways managers and stakeholders can
cooperatively analyze the context of a project and the implications
for project design that emerge from such analyses.
Organization -
Organizing the structure of a participatory monitoring project
Participatory monitoring projects can involve several organizations,
each with their own structures and goals. This module offers
suggestions for sponsorship organizations, defining roles and
responsibilities, and developing contracts and formal agreements
between organizations. The effectiveness of the project, and the ease
of pursuing similar future projects, can be facilitated by explicitly
defining the roles and responsibilities of each organization in the
early stages of planning.
Participants
-
Recruiting, selecting, authorizing, and dismissing participants
This module offers suggestions about identifying participants,
fostering leaders within the group, and setting ground rules for
respectful behavior. Also included are specific suggestions for
working with representatives of stakeholder groups.
Communication
-
Developing good understandings and agreements
This module offers suggestions for addressing differing communication
styles, perspectives, and languages among collaborating individuals
and groups. Although monitoring projects work better when effective
communication builds trust between participants, managers, and
scientists, such trust also is often an important goal. Facilitation,
communication, and trust-building are such important and specialized
skills that this module includes suggestions for obtaining help.
Incentives -
Understanding motivations, concerns, and anticipated benefits
This module provides examples of the variety of incentives
participants might have for becoming involved in a project, both as
stakeholders and as individuals. Discussing these incentives during
the planning stage can help avoid conflict later. Also included are
suggestions for finding common ground among participants and insuring
that everyone benefits from the experience of being involved in the
monitoring project.
Design - Involving
participants in project design
While many people initially assume that participation in a monitoring
project is limited to helping with data collection, some of the most
successful projects involve participants in the project design or are
initially designed by community groups. Stakeholders generally have a
variety of skills and expertise they can contribute to a monitoring
project. This module offers suggestions for how to determine if
collaborating with participants on project design is appropriate, and
if so, ways to match their roles in the project to the knowledge,
skills or abilities that each possesses.
Resources -
Obtaining and allocating funds, resources, and support
Involving participants in a monitoring project can affect the budget
in a number of ways, especially by creating opportunities to leverage
funds from sources that support public participation in natural
resource management and science. Although monitoring projects
sometimes involve volunteers, participants can be compensated for
their time and effort in a variety of ways. Thorough budgeting and
tracking of expenditures can be especially important to the
development and maintenance of clear agreements among participants.
Also included are suggestions for fundraising, in-kind contributions,
and community support.
IMPLEMENTATION STAGE
Although it might be ideal to include participants in the early stages
of a monitoring project (in order to build trust and establish common
goals) many of the benefits of participation can still be effectively
achieved by involving participants after a project has begun. The
Implementation Stage consists of such topics as training, safety,
planning field activities, creating sampling designs, devising data
collection procedures, and ensuring the data are of high quality and
handled responsibly.
Training -
Providing participants with requisite training
This module discusses development and documentation of training
programs to suit the needs of the project and match the skills of
participants. Any skills that are needed to conduct a participatory
monitoring project, and that are lacking among participants, are
potential candidates for training. However, training can be
time-consuming or costly, so resources and time can be saved by
assigning priorities, matching training to needs, and investigating
cost-effective training strategies. Appropriate and documented
training helps ensure good communication, data credibility, safety,
and self-esteem.
Safety - Ensuring
safety and planning for emergencies
This module offers suggestions for creating and documenting safety and
emergency plans that ensure everyone has a safe and enjoyable
experience while collecting monitoring data.
Field - Planning
field activities
Careful planning of logistics for fieldwork is essential to the smooth
operation of a monitoring project. Involving participants in
fieldwork need not be significantly more time-consuming if travel,
schedules, equipment, safety and support activities are explained and
clearly discussed before fieldwork begins.
Sampling -
Developing sampling designs and data collection procedures
Experts should create sampling designs, but participants are more
likely to implement sampling protocols carefully and appropriately if
they understanding the rationale behind the design. Participants
might also be able to lend insights that make the design more
efficient. Understanding the reasoning behind the chosen sampling
designs and protocols will enhance participant understanding of, and
trust in, the monitoring results.
Quality - Ensuring
the quality and credibility of collected data
Developing a quality assurance plan does much to effectively address
concern on the part of managers and scientist about the credibility of
data collected by participants. Many projects use third party auditing
to alleviate concerns about data quality. This module offers
suggestions for developing a quality assurance plan, quality control
procedures, a quality assessment plan and other ways to address the
issue of data quality.
Data - Making
arrangements for handling, storing, and using data
This module discusses data handling, backup, filing, compatibility
with other databases, and accessibility. Also addressed are issues of
data ownership, use, and distribution; topics that are of particular
importance in the context of former grievances or mistrust among
collaborators.
FOLLOW-THROUGH STAGE
Even if participants were not involved in the Planning or
Implementation stages of a monitoring project, involving them in the
analysis and reporting of the monitoring data can ensure that results
are useful to stakeholders and might help build trust for the next
monitoring project. This Follow-Through stage is yet another
opportunity for participants and managers to learn from each other and
to determine the next steps for the monitoring project and the
collaborative relationship that has been built.
Analysis -
Arranging for periodic data analysis
Although statistical analyses should be conducted by experts,
participants can contribute insight and local expertise to the review
and interpretation of the results. This module offers suggestions for
anticipating the time and money required to conduct periodic analysis
of monitoring data, as well as ways to involve participants in
interpretation of the results.
Reporting -
Arranging for reporting results
Disseminating project results to interested parties, and ensuring they
are used, is a follow-up process that rewards participants with the
feeling that their time and efforts were worthwhile. If monitoring
results are being used to resolve conflicts over land management,
prior agreements about how results are reported and used can prevent
or alleviate subsequent animosity. This module offers suggestions for
reporting results, addressing concerns, archiving publications, and
making sure everything is disseminated in formats and languages that
all stakeholders can understand.
Evaluation -
Evaluating and improving the project
Evaluation of a participatory monitoring project mirrors the cyclical
process of adaptive forest management. As with adaptive management,
the process (implementation, monitoring, evaluation, adjustment) is
most effective when it is inclusive of all stakeholders and points of
view. This module offers suggestions for ways to continually evaluate
whether the participatory monitoring project is meeting both its
biological and collaboration goals and to revise the process if goals
are not being met.
Celebrations -
Ensuring the project is rewarding and widely appreciated
Rewarding and celebrating everyone’s contributions to the monitoring
project helps sustain motivation and is fun. Public acknowledgement
is usually highly appreciated and provides a forum that also enhances
community appreciation and support.
©2005
Institute for
Culture and Ecology
|